Joined
·
33 Posts
I submit this review because ALL you see on the net is the top line Turbo versions reviewed. I replaced a 2007 Ford Edge with this little car. The Edge was a fine vehicle - big wagon. But my son needed a good reliable car and the Edge worked well for us for 3 years, so he gets it and I got the 2020 Kona SEL Plus. The Kona is a CAR to me. Not a CUV. I grew up with Pinto and Vega Wagons. Escorts in 5 doors. I test drove a Toyota Matrix once - not much difference other than the Kona has to be called a Crossover to sell? What makes this NOT be reviewed with VW Golfs and the like? We also have a 2020 Santa Fe Ultimate (?) wife's vehicle - has everything but turbo and AWD. My car is basically my commuter car for around 20 - 30 miles per day and quickie errands. THe Edge struggled to get to 19 in mixed driving. Kona is around 28 so far.
I am old enough that "boy racer" doesn't have appeal. Stop light bombing is of no value to me. So the Turbo whizbang DCT is of no interest. Nothing against anyone that does want that. But the DCT gets panned pretty much in the reviews. I don't need NAV to find work everyday. I can use the Android Auto if I need NAV on the display. To that end, we compared the blue link NAV with Android Aut and Google in the SF. Different ways of getting to the same palce. And Blue Link won't always tell you which side of the road the destination is on.
Nor do I need smart cruise. That is nice on the wife's SF when we take a trip, though. So the SEL plus checked the boxes for my car.
The 2.0 with AT is fine. I can hit 60 before I get in anyone's way. Usually without flooring it. (could be that Orange is the fastest color - LOL) Speed limit to work is no more than 55. Bringing it home up I-77, it held 79 mph with cruise on (+/- 2 mph) up and down hills. (33 mpg avg, btw) Better than the SF. It does occasionally struggle with the constant up/downs we have in NW NC. But that is any car with less than a V6 around here.
I can zip around town and bomb a backroad if I want. I like the semi manual trans option ("his & hers shifter" if you're old enough to remember that term). Handles nicely. Which brings me to a thing I have seen many times when these are reviewed - reviewers say the steering is twitchy and requires constant input. So I had my LKS set to warning only and didn't notice anything out of the ordinary. However, when I set it to "normal" or "active", the car is making constant corrections, and then you correct, and the cycle goes on and on. If it seems like you are constantly correcting, try turning it to warning only. With it in normal or active, the car will mostly drive itself so long as I'm there for intersections. And it is much gentler and smoother than our SF. The SF will almost fight you if you try to change lanes without a signal.
AC is doing the best it can in the 90 degree weather of the last week. Stereo might not be quite as loud as the Edge (it had the factory good one). The EQ is a little different than the Edge which was dang good for my ears. But it does good enough. I can get it louder than I can sing so that's a good thing. LOL Bluesville and70s on 7 for me for reference.
I still don't care for the industrial polyester pants they call upholstery. My last two vehicles had leather. so that was a concession for the SEL plus. I can deal with the rest of the plastic. The old school manual handbrake is novel. Our SF has the electronic and last two cars were big enough to have a pedal. I have always liked the idea of small cars, However, the seats don't always fit my large person. The Tucson wife had before her SF had evil seats I thought. I couldn't wait for that car to go away. THe SF is very nice. The Kona fits me fine. Wife likes it as well. Surprisingly wide seats for a small car. Set it and forget it. no messing with seat memory or anything like that. My car. Very little sharing for this one. Can't attest to the heated feature yet.
No power liftgate option for any level, I think I read. Might be a consderation although the operation of hatch is pretty light compared to the Edge and our old Tucson. Oh yeah, it's tiny back there too. Not much room for much other than groceries. You're not going to Lowe's and bring home a weekend's worth of project materials like I could with the Edge. I put a STOVE in the back of the Edge with room around it for other junk going to storage. a 4' round dining room table once too. Kona? Never. The U in CuV should be a lower case letter. No factory hitch either for your bike rack, etc. Ther eis storage under the floor for a few items. And the cover up top will drop down and fit in the space on floor if you have like a tall skinny box (medium screen tv?) back there.
Halogen headlights are just ok. I'm trying to run over all the points I've seen here and on other places. We're old enough that we aren't out after dark that much, so no big deal. If we are on a trip, we'll be in the SF with LED lighting. We did drive the Kona up on the Blue Ridge Parkway for July 4 and the lights did fine after dark. We survived and had a good time. Not much else matters right? IF they are too dim for you, either upgrade or drive slower. Being this is a lease, I'll not be messing with it too much. Altough a set of silverstars might help?
What else? I tried to cover everything I have seen in reviews of the top lines. And some things I've seen on here. IF someone is looking for a review of a lower car, here ya go. And also, I am not the target for this car. Target market would be younger folks looking for a taste of adventure I guess? My step son likes theSubaru Crosstrek and this seems to beat it in other reviews. This seems to be a nice sporty little car that does a lot of things well in day to day life without having to make a lot of compromises. Highly recommended.
I am old enough that "boy racer" doesn't have appeal. Stop light bombing is of no value to me. So the Turbo whizbang DCT is of no interest. Nothing against anyone that does want that. But the DCT gets panned pretty much in the reviews. I don't need NAV to find work everyday. I can use the Android Auto if I need NAV on the display. To that end, we compared the blue link NAV with Android Aut and Google in the SF. Different ways of getting to the same palce. And Blue Link won't always tell you which side of the road the destination is on.
Nor do I need smart cruise. That is nice on the wife's SF when we take a trip, though. So the SEL plus checked the boxes for my car.
The 2.0 with AT is fine. I can hit 60 before I get in anyone's way. Usually without flooring it. (could be that Orange is the fastest color - LOL) Speed limit to work is no more than 55. Bringing it home up I-77, it held 79 mph with cruise on (+/- 2 mph) up and down hills. (33 mpg avg, btw) Better than the SF. It does occasionally struggle with the constant up/downs we have in NW NC. But that is any car with less than a V6 around here.
I can zip around town and bomb a backroad if I want. I like the semi manual trans option ("his & hers shifter" if you're old enough to remember that term). Handles nicely. Which brings me to a thing I have seen many times when these are reviewed - reviewers say the steering is twitchy and requires constant input. So I had my LKS set to warning only and didn't notice anything out of the ordinary. However, when I set it to "normal" or "active", the car is making constant corrections, and then you correct, and the cycle goes on and on. If it seems like you are constantly correcting, try turning it to warning only. With it in normal or active, the car will mostly drive itself so long as I'm there for intersections. And it is much gentler and smoother than our SF. The SF will almost fight you if you try to change lanes without a signal.
AC is doing the best it can in the 90 degree weather of the last week. Stereo might not be quite as loud as the Edge (it had the factory good one). The EQ is a little different than the Edge which was dang good for my ears. But it does good enough. I can get it louder than I can sing so that's a good thing. LOL Bluesville and70s on 7 for me for reference.
I still don't care for the industrial polyester pants they call upholstery. My last two vehicles had leather. so that was a concession for the SEL plus. I can deal with the rest of the plastic. The old school manual handbrake is novel. Our SF has the electronic and last two cars were big enough to have a pedal. I have always liked the idea of small cars, However, the seats don't always fit my large person. The Tucson wife had before her SF had evil seats I thought. I couldn't wait for that car to go away. THe SF is very nice. The Kona fits me fine. Wife likes it as well. Surprisingly wide seats for a small car. Set it and forget it. no messing with seat memory or anything like that. My car. Very little sharing for this one. Can't attest to the heated feature yet.
No power liftgate option for any level, I think I read. Might be a consderation although the operation of hatch is pretty light compared to the Edge and our old Tucson. Oh yeah, it's tiny back there too. Not much room for much other than groceries. You're not going to Lowe's and bring home a weekend's worth of project materials like I could with the Edge. I put a STOVE in the back of the Edge with room around it for other junk going to storage. a 4' round dining room table once too. Kona? Never. The U in CuV should be a lower case letter. No factory hitch either for your bike rack, etc. Ther eis storage under the floor for a few items. And the cover up top will drop down and fit in the space on floor if you have like a tall skinny box (medium screen tv?) back there.
Halogen headlights are just ok. I'm trying to run over all the points I've seen here and on other places. We're old enough that we aren't out after dark that much, so no big deal. If we are on a trip, we'll be in the SF with LED lighting. We did drive the Kona up on the Blue Ridge Parkway for July 4 and the lights did fine after dark. We survived and had a good time. Not much else matters right? IF they are too dim for you, either upgrade or drive slower. Being this is a lease, I'll not be messing with it too much. Altough a set of silverstars might help?
What else? I tried to cover everything I have seen in reviews of the top lines. And some things I've seen on here. IF someone is looking for a review of a lower car, here ya go. And also, I am not the target for this car. Target market would be younger folks looking for a taste of adventure I guess? My step son likes theSubaru Crosstrek and this seems to beat it in other reviews. This seems to be a nice sporty little car that does a lot of things well in day to day life without having to make a lot of compromises. Highly recommended.